|
Neuromorphometrics Inc
neuromorphometrics toolbox Neuromorphometrics Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/pmc09645766-465-17-17 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neuromorphometrics toolbox - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Neuromorphometrics Inc
neuromorphometrics spm toolbox ![]() Neuromorphometrics Spm Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/spm+neuromorphometrics/pmc09397125-204-50-56 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neuromorphometrics spm toolbox - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Neuromorphometrics Inc
spm neuromorphometrics toolbox ![]() Spm Neuromorphometrics Toolbox, supplied by Neuromorphometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/neuromorphometrics+toolbox/spm+neuromorphometrics/bio_rxiv__2022__08__01__502365-200-10-11 Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
spm neuromorphometrics toolbox - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the seven participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the 12 participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05.
Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.
Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1, * p HB < 0.05. (B) Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer rsROI and planum temporale (blue, top row) or posterior insula (green, bottom row), as a function of misophonia score.
Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each HMAT fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. † p HB < 0.1.
Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the
Techniques: Functional Assay
Journal: Frontiers in Neuroscience
Article Title: Neural evidence for non-orofacial triggers in mild misophonia
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.880759
Figure Lengend Snippet: Functional connectivity between each Freesurfer fROI (top row = Orofacial, bottom row = Finger) and each non-sensorimotor ROI. Red bars = average connectivity across the participants with higher misophonia scores. Gray bars = average connectivity across the participants with lower misophonia scores. Error bars are standard error of the mean. * p HB < 0.05.
Article Snippet: Of note, although previous literature has described group differences in the anterior insula, the corresponding coordinates of maxima activation/connectivity fall closer to the posterior insula ROI used in this study; we do not see this as an incompatible finding, but rather an artifact of using different anatomical atlases across the
Techniques: Functional Assay